I vaguely remember myself rambling over how bad the
previous installation of Harry Potter was, and I actually told Jack that it was the director's fault for that. Apparently, they hadn't changed the director for the last three movies.
Bimbo moment. While we've heard from a close friend that the movie was (still) a letdown, we needed a proper closure, and skipping the last parter was equivalent to tearing out the last few pages of a storybook and throwing them into the wind.

Few reasons why I think Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is probably the best of the 7-parter epic story about the boy wizard:
One. The cast. It's like Chinese New Year's Eve all over again, except it was as though everyone returned to the screen just to die. And Potterphiles would already have, at their fingertips, the names of those who'll be dying in the final movie. Besides, it's a movie both lovers and haters who have grown up with Harry Potter would want to watch, just to find out how our bespectacled protagonist fare against his blood seeker.
Two. 5 hours. That's how long I believe Movie 7 will be, including 2.5 hours for the first half. And if you've read the book
and watched the movie, it would dawn upon you that alot of intricate details have been delicately removed from the original plot
without harming the harmony of the entire movie. This was unlike the previous movies' plots, which have been lifted from the book so haphazardly that they hardly formed a coherent picture with non-readers.
Three. Those boys and that girl. Look what time has done to them. Do you
even remember how our darling boy wizard and his sidekicks looked like in the first movie?
... not something I'd go gaga over. But 9 years changes alot of things. Alot. 9 years ago, I just stepped into secondary school. *Gags* 9 years ago, there was an order for one bespectacled ebony-haired boy, one gingerhead sleepyhead and one little girl with a bushy mane. They were nodescript kids of other people, until they got fished out of their big pond and into this huge Potter phenomenon. Lights, camera, action.

Rupert Grint (who plays Ron Weasley) put on so much bulk in the last movie, his biceps looked bigger than his head. While he didn't look anything like Taylor Lautner, he put on just enough to dwarf his co-stars. Daniel Radcliffe was... apologies, but he's not my type. But there's a common consensus as to how Emma Watson (who plays Hermione Granger) has metamorphosized into a beautiful young lady. While she was already developing beautiful curves and teasing male teenage minds since Goblet of Fire, she's got the men now. Even when she's chopped off her signature locks for a short crop, Watson's still every inch the man-eater, and with the Ivy League brains to boot. So can we safely say Harry Potter's finally a movie for everyone in the family now?